Alderman Scott-Childress wrote a letter to the editor and got a bunch of Democrat committeemen to sign it. (Of course he lacked the courage to sign it himself).
In this letter, he claimed that Alderwoman Brown and Mills are "sabotaging" the budget by voting no.
First of all, 2 Alderman alone do not have that power. Seven Aldermen and the Mayor working together cannot be overruled. As such, his assertion is asinine.
What is the real point of the letter then? Well, the Democrats tried last city election to primary Alderwoman Mills, but lost. Obviously, they intend to try again.
Mills is a moderate to conservative Democrat. This is something the Democrat Committee will not tolerate. They expect their members to vote left wing only. The so-called party of tolerance allows no contrary opinion.
The second reason for the letter is to create a scapegoat. City voters ate extremely unhappy with the Council majority.
So, clearly Democrats intend to try to blame Mills and Brown by falsely claiming they were blocked from their goals.
Think about how ridiculous such an assertion is. How can 2 Alderman block anything? Legally, they can block nothing.
This is just another political stunt from intolerant far left wingers who have accomplished nothing and who are hurting our city.