Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Proof
I and many others have stated that President Obama is a Socialist. Democrats have denied this. More often than not, the response from liberals has been that Obama is not a Socialist and is a moderate.
Now, there is proof that Obama is indeed a Socialist. The core of socialism is redistribution of wealth. Socialists believe that money and wealth should be taken and given to those they believe deserve it. The idea is forced equality regardless of merit and work.
Take a listen to the comments made by President Obama on the YouTube link below. Take special notice of President Obama's statement, "I actually believe in redistribution."
Now, there is proof that Obama is indeed a Socialist. The core of socialism is redistribution of wealth. Socialists believe that money and wealth should be taken and given to those they believe deserve it. The idea is forced equality regardless of merit and work.
Take a listen to the comments made by President Obama on the YouTube link below. Take special notice of President Obama's statement, "I actually believe in redistribution."
Friday, September 14, 2012
United States Credit Rating Downgraded Again
After the Federal Reserve announced it was printing and injecting $40 billion dollars into the U.S. economy (a move seen by many as a way to temporarily inflate the numbers to favor the reelection of President Obama), ratings firm Egan-Jones cut its credit rating on
the U.S. government to "AA-" from "AA," citing its opinion that
quantitative easing from the Federal Reserve would hurt the U.S. economy
and the country's credit quality.
In its downgrade, the firm said that issuing more currency and depressing interest rates through purchasing mortgage-backed securities does little to raise the U.S.'s real GDP but reduces the value of the dollar.
"In turn, this increases the cost of commodities, which will pressure the profitability of businesses and increase the costs of consumers thereby reducing consumer purchasing power," the firm said.
The credit rating of our country was always the absolute best and had never been downgraded. Now, with one term of Barack Obama not even completed, we have been downgraded twice.
We need new leadership and it starts with a new President.
In its downgrade, the firm said that issuing more currency and depressing interest rates through purchasing mortgage-backed securities does little to raise the U.S.'s real GDP but reduces the value of the dollar.
"In turn, this increases the cost of commodities, which will pressure the profitability of businesses and increase the costs of consumers thereby reducing consumer purchasing power," the firm said.
The credit rating of our country was always the absolute best and had never been downgraded. Now, with one term of Barack Obama not even completed, we have been downgraded twice.
We need new leadership and it starts with a new President.
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Talk About Insane
Three news stories have come to light which cause me to shake my head and wonder if any sane person is currently running our country or our foreign policy.
First, it is being reported by various non-partisan news sources that the Marines assigned as security detail for our embassy in Egypt were under orders by our Ambassador to Egypt not to carry live ammunition. Instead, we were relying upon Egypt security (run by the Muslim Brotherhood) to guard our sovereign territory, i.e. the embassy and its personnel. The idea of having unarmed Marines guarding our embassy in Egypt, especially given the current political climate there, is absolute lunacy.
A former Democratic elected official (Zell Miller) once said at the Republican National Convention in 2004 that he was concerned that national Democrats were planning to weaken our national defense. He asked whether our country was to be defended "with spitballs". Apparently, this was the case for our Marines in Egypt.
Second, it is now being reported that the White House was informed of dangerous protests and violent outbursts against our embassies in Egypt and several other countries 48 HOURS BEFORE IT HAPPENED. Yet, NOTHING was done to protect our embassies or our citizens. Now, one of our ambassadors is dead along with an aide and 2 marines.
Why was nothing done?
Third and finally, the official initial response from our country after these attacks was an apology for offending the Islamist terrorists and attackers. The media did not criticize this at all. Yet, when Governor Romney expressed his outrage over this abysmal response, the Obama pocket media attacked Romney while giving Obama a pass.
Sometimes, with this administration, I feel like I am in the Twilight Zone. Right is deemed wrong and a proper objection is deemed treasonous. It was bad enough when there was no white or black, just grey. Now, it has been completely reversed so that anything pro-America is deemed politically incorrect and wrong. If I say the pledge of allegiance, I am apparently offending people. If I say God Bless America, I am anti-atheist or anti-agnostic. The majority of people at the Democrat Convention booed God. The majority of the media did not criticize this, but instead criticized those who objected to the booing.
After all of this, I am forced to ask some questions. What's wrong with people? Has the whole country gone mad? Am I, as a proud and patriotic American, in the minority? Is the United States not the greatest country in the world? Or am I somehow a racist, "Europhobe", or "Middle Eastphobe" for believing that America is the best?
Man, do I need a beer!!
First, it is being reported by various non-partisan news sources that the Marines assigned as security detail for our embassy in Egypt were under orders by our Ambassador to Egypt not to carry live ammunition. Instead, we were relying upon Egypt security (run by the Muslim Brotherhood) to guard our sovereign territory, i.e. the embassy and its personnel. The idea of having unarmed Marines guarding our embassy in Egypt, especially given the current political climate there, is absolute lunacy.
A former Democratic elected official (Zell Miller) once said at the Republican National Convention in 2004 that he was concerned that national Democrats were planning to weaken our national defense. He asked whether our country was to be defended "with spitballs". Apparently, this was the case for our Marines in Egypt.
Second, it is now being reported that the White House was informed of dangerous protests and violent outbursts against our embassies in Egypt and several other countries 48 HOURS BEFORE IT HAPPENED. Yet, NOTHING was done to protect our embassies or our citizens. Now, one of our ambassadors is dead along with an aide and 2 marines.
Why was nothing done?
Third and finally, the official initial response from our country after these attacks was an apology for offending the Islamist terrorists and attackers. The media did not criticize this at all. Yet, when Governor Romney expressed his outrage over this abysmal response, the Obama pocket media attacked Romney while giving Obama a pass.
Sometimes, with this administration, I feel like I am in the Twilight Zone. Right is deemed wrong and a proper objection is deemed treasonous. It was bad enough when there was no white or black, just grey. Now, it has been completely reversed so that anything pro-America is deemed politically incorrect and wrong. If I say the pledge of allegiance, I am apparently offending people. If I say God Bless America, I am anti-atheist or anti-agnostic. The majority of people at the Democrat Convention booed God. The majority of the media did not criticize this, but instead criticized those who objected to the booing.
After all of this, I am forced to ask some questions. What's wrong with people? Has the whole country gone mad? Am I, as a proud and patriotic American, in the minority? Is the United States not the greatest country in the world? Or am I somehow a racist, "Europhobe", or "Middle Eastphobe" for believing that America is the best?
Man, do I need a beer!!
Monday, September 10, 2012
Friday, September 7, 2012
Gibson Counters His Opponent's Lies
We have already documented the lies being spewed against Congressman Gibson by his obviously desperate opponent. The response from the Gibson camp is set forth below. You may also click HERE to go directly to the link which sets forth the response with better graphics and fonts.
********************************
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT
Why our opponent has a credibility problem
PAID FOR BY CHRIS GIBSON FOR CONGRESS
Our opponent routinely uses false attacks and distortions to advance his partisan narrative. Devoid of vision and inspiration, his campaign represents all that is wrong with American politics.
Here are just a few of the most egregious and oft-repeated false attacks.
False claim: “[Gibson] quickly began supporting the Tea Party’s radical agenda.” [Julian for NY Press Release, August 14, 2012]…“And his voting record is not one of a moderate.” [Timestamp: 3:30]
Fact: Congressman Gibson enjoys broad support across the political spectrum, from conservative Republicans and pragmatic Independents to moderate Democrats. The Washington Post ranks him as the 3rd most independent Republican in the House of Representatives [U.S. Congress Votes Database, Washington Post, Accessed August 30, 2012] and he was ranked at the center of the House by National Journal in 2011. [Members in the Middle: House Members with Centrist Records, National Journal, March 2, 2012].
False claim: “Congressman Chris Gibson has voted to effectively end Medicare as we know it by turning it into a coupon program.” [Julian for NY Website, Accessed August 30, 2012] “Guaranteed coverage is gone” [Politics of Fear Target Elderly, Times Union, August 22, 2012]
Fact: The non-partisan fact-checker organization, Politifact, called the claim that the Republicans voted to end Medicare the 2011 “lie of the year.” With the nonpartisan Medicare trustees estimating Medicare will go broke in a little over a decade, what ends Medicare is the status quo. That is not an option – Congressman Gibson believes we owe it to those who built this country to fulfill our pledges and commitments we made to them. He has supported two different proposals to date that ensure we honor those pledges. The premium support proposal in the Republican budget would allow future seniors -those 54 and younger - to choose between a variety of federally pre-approved plans (like 25 percent of Medicare beneficiaries already do) to pick the coverage option that best meets their needs. Plans would be required to offer coverage to every senior (they could not cherry pick beneficiaries), and lower income seniors and the chronically ill would receive more money from the government while the wealthiest seniors would receive less. Anyone 55 or older would have absolutely no change in their benefits. The most recent iteration of the premium support model would have the option to choose between traditional Medicare or a pre-approved plan, with the government paying the full cost for at least two plan options. This year Congressman Gibson supported the bipartisan budget proposal (Cooper-LaTourette) that incorporates an accountable care approach, broader access to discount drugs, and additional measures to combat fraud, waste, and abuse. Congressman Gibson has demonstrated a willingness to work together with Democrats to ensure we save Medicare from bankruptcy and strengthen it for future generations. [Additional Resources: “Republicans Voted to End Medicare is 2011 Lie of the Year, Politifact; “$6,400 Myth,” Wall Street Journal, August 19, 2012; “Despite Democrats’ Warnings, Private Medicare Plans Find Success,” New York Times, August 25, 2012]
False claim: “…one area where a majority of Republicans went one way and [Gibson] broke with them was support for the small business innovation research fund....He was against it when even a majority of Republicans supported it.” [Timestamp: 3:39]
Fact: Congressman Gibson voted four times (H.R. 366, H.R. 2608, S. 1082, and H.R. 1540) to extend and reauthorize the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program. [Library of Congress THOMAS]
Sunday, September 2, 2012
"The Lie of the Year" being spread by Julian Schreibman
It would appear that Julian Schreibman, the Democrat candidate for Congressman, is either out of ideas, desperate, or just following the "Mediscare" play book. Perhaps it is all three.
Over the last 4 days, I have received fliers at my home from or on behalf of the Schreibman campaign containing a massive lie. The ads accuse Congressman Gibson of "gutting Medicare" and "ending Medicare as we know it". Now, there is a front page story in the Daily Freeman.
This is of course the lie liberal Democrats have been spreading about Paul Ryan and is plan to save Medicare. The Albany Times Union, which is a very strong Democrat paper, recently ran an article stating that Julian Schreibman is playing "Mediscare politics". (http://bit.ly/RgFUxB). When a Democrat rag like the Times Union says that about a Democrat or frankly says anything negative about a Democrat, it is saying something.
It should also be noted that PolitiFact examined the claims of Schreibman and his fellow left wingers that the Romney-Ryan plan would "end Medicare as we know it". These non-partisan fact checkers concluded that the claim was the "Lie of the Year". Imagine that. Schreibman is continuing to spread the "lie of the year". That speaks volumes about his credibility. What is next? Will Schreibman and his supporters run an ad depicting Congressman Gibson throwing an old lady in a wheelchair over a cliff like the national democrats did to Paul Ryan? Here's an idea for Mr. Schreibman. Try to campaign honestly and stop spreading the "lie of the year". Stop trying to scare seniors and offer some real plans for the future. If you do not support the Ryan-Romney plan, then what is your plan to keep Medicare solvent? Finally, stop sending lying and negative attack ads to my home and the homes of other voters.
In German, "Schreibman" means writing man. Perhaps we should refer to him as "Schreibliegen" which means writing lies.
Over the last 4 days, I have received fliers at my home from or on behalf of the Schreibman campaign containing a massive lie. The ads accuse Congressman Gibson of "gutting Medicare" and "ending Medicare as we know it". Now, there is a front page story in the Daily Freeman.
This is of course the lie liberal Democrats have been spreading about Paul Ryan and is plan to save Medicare. The Albany Times Union, which is a very strong Democrat paper, recently ran an article stating that Julian Schreibman is playing "Mediscare politics". (http://bit.ly/RgFUxB). When a Democrat rag like the Times Union says that about a Democrat or frankly says anything negative about a Democrat, it is saying something.
It should also be noted that PolitiFact examined the claims of Schreibman and his fellow left wingers that the Romney-Ryan plan would "end Medicare as we know it". These non-partisan fact checkers concluded that the claim was the "Lie of the Year". Imagine that. Schreibman is continuing to spread the "lie of the year". That speaks volumes about his credibility. What is next? Will Schreibman and his supporters run an ad depicting Congressman Gibson throwing an old lady in a wheelchair over a cliff like the national democrats did to Paul Ryan? Here's an idea for Mr. Schreibman. Try to campaign honestly and stop spreading the "lie of the year". Stop trying to scare seniors and offer some real plans for the future. If you do not support the Ryan-Romney plan, then what is your plan to keep Medicare solvent? Finally, stop sending lying and negative attack ads to my home and the homes of other voters.
In German, "Schreibman" means writing man. Perhaps we should refer to him as "Schreibliegen" which means writing lies.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
