tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5508937698219343429.post3665228027605800023..comments2023-06-20T08:48:56.486-04:00Comments on Cahill on Kingston: Here's a DoozyRichard T. Cahill Jr.http://www.blogger.com/profile/02054131277003378173noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5508937698219343429.post-46808914826992111672012-08-30T00:03:58.195-04:002012-08-30T00:03:58.195-04:00Andrew,
Thank you for the citation.
Courts do n...Andrew,<br /><br />Thank you for the citation. <br /><br />Courts do not always follow precedent. Also, good lawyers find a way to distinguish the facts of two different cases to thus demonstrate that the prior case is really not instructive on the new matter. It is part of the art of practicing law.Richard T. Cahill Jr.https://www.blogger.com/profile/02054131277003378173noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5508937698219343429.post-90532733625585525752012-08-29T10:46:42.322-04:002012-08-29T10:46:42.322-04:00Mr. Cahill,
Since you've spoken of your inter...Mr. Cahill,<br /><br />Since you've spoken of your interest in cases that set precedent or establish law, I thought you might be interested in this link, http://www.woodworkersjournal.com/woodworking_blog/index.php/ryobi-wins-table-saw-safety-litigation/<br />about a Chicago civil case that sided with the defendant (Ryobi Tools) in a tablesaw negligence case. It's contrary to an earlier decision in another suit that sided with the plaintiff. As I understand it, the arguements were about the same in both cases.<br /><br />Sorry to send this through your blog, but I have no other email address for you. <br /><br />Thanks,<br />Andrew Champ-DoranAndrew Champ-Dorannoreply@blogger.com